MY SHELTER
As I have come to realize in the last plus/minus 40 years, the entire scientific community has completely failed when it comes to >Plato's Atlantis<. - This excludes fantastic and utopian works that have no claim to historicity from the outset. - Television and the Internet also navigate to the subject of Atlantis - for lack of factual knowledge - in utopian/fantastic realms, - which have nothing in common with Plato's Atlantis, except the name (Atlantis) ...and Wikipedia denies itself any competence, ...when it dates the >victory of Athens over the Atlanteans<, (Tim. 24 e) ...a few thousand years before the founding of the city of Athens itself...
...said 11,500 years BC as the demise date of Atlantis, come from a milkmaid calculation of the Atlantis-specialists, who simply added >Plato's 9,000 years< (Tim. 23 e) plus the (approximately) 2,500 years that have passed since then. The calculation is correct; the problem only arises if one does not take into account that they are impatibel with each other and thus have different values...
Atlantis only becomes real when the Atlanteans' attempted conquest of land (not in Greece, but in Egypt) can be documented. On the Med. Habu plate 32-34, >RAMSES III IN THE LAND-BATTLE AGAINST THE ATLANTIC CREW'S ATTACK<. the same frequencies appear as we know them from Plato's >LIST OF CONSTITUTIONS< (Cri. 119 b).
Just read my book on this; it's worth it:
WAY TO
ATLANTIS
ISBN 978-3-00-034102-1 PDF